You can use content blocks to arrange your articles, large texts, instructions. Combine these blocks with media blocks to add illustrations and video tutorials. You can use various content blocks to work with your text. Add quotations, lists, buttons. Select your text to change its formatting or add links. Mobirise is a simple website builder that helps you create amazing web pages without knowing any code.
We are too blind to the cultural foundations of law and order. Why do we tolerate freeloaders in the Liberal Democratic World who want to overturn our laws? The Quran and Authoritarianism are incompatible with Liberal Democratic law and culture. The current world order is divided into three groups based on the philosophical foundation of their legal systems: The first group is the Greco-Roman-Democratic-Humanistic group, also known as the "free world." The second group is the post-communist autocratic group. The third group is the Islamic group. The United Nations was founded on the assumption that a single legal order could exist. Over time, however, we have learned that this is not yet true.
In this in fact multipolar world, there are three legal spaces or domains: liberal Democracies, Autocracies, and Islamic.
The first entity controls the internet, global payment systems, and sea transportation. Although it is called the West, it is global. A more accurate name would be "liberal democracy," which includes countries like Japan and South Korea, which are considered to be in the East. It encompasses nations around the world that adhere to a rules-based world order. This order is not static. Rather, it is evolving alongside humanity as we progress toward the sixth iteration of Western civilization, which is no longer truly Western.
About typical government diseases, such as nepotism and meritocracy, that turn governments into tumors on society.
liberty, equality, fraternity (at the expense of whom or what?)
If I have the agenda to parasite on you, I need to polarize and create a we versus your situation. When the French invented this, they called it left versus right. With that they created the discussion (a story) of the parasitic city elites (the hypocrelite) that does not take care for the people anymore, but only about the one elite versus the other elite. Leaving for people only the question what elite they like best! So that people forget what is best for them and can be taken advantage of.
The Left versus Right lie
The Left versus right paradigma is the parasitic city elite mechanism to wrench the population. Not the mechanism to provide good public services. The left versus right narrative is A fairy tale to stun and dominate the people. We should at least talk in the terms "economic left" and "cultural left" because people can be on the economic left (regarding money and income) and on the cultural right (regarding migration and wokeness).
Natural attitudes towards human cooperation
Everybody can see that a modern society can not function without good public services. If we want to build a society without trias-parasitico or hypocrelite, we have to recognize that there are three attitudes possible from the individual towards public services.
If we look to the history of politics, we can clearly recognize another aspect of dominant division that is actual more critical to type of attitude towards public services, namely nation central dominance (controlled) versus "Laissez Faire" (let it be). Communists and (National) Socialists are clear historic examples of controlled politics. And nowadays, all technocrat politics have a tendency to soft or hard crowd control. The World Economic Forum is a typical example of this. Also, belief systems linked to dogma's about social organization and prescribe laws can be classified as controlled (via mantal states).
We then recognize three herds (groups) of people based on social engagement and attitudes toward public services:
The people who think (or have learned to think) that a public services is like a natural phenomenon. I call them "the Indifferent". (The majority of the people in a well function society)
The people who know that public services ar businesses with a guarantied cash flow and seek to benefit from that. What I call “the Parasites”. (The people with all kind of good stories why they should have a part of the tax pie but never talking about the real story). The parasitic-class.
The people who work together and like to solve problems, collective (together). In public services, or in non-governmental clubs. I call them “the Co-operates”. The co-op-class.
The Indifferent and Parasites have a preference for control. The Naive for full control by a government so they don't need to think about it. The Parasites for control by business and/or government (what ever benefits them the most)
The co-operates take responsibility for their social environment and work together for the collective benefit, they expect good public services provisioning without interfering unnecessary in their daily lives. And they understand that this is done by co-operation.
The big picture on the tensions in society today is (I think) the Parasites and the Indifferent versus the Co-operates. Where the Indifferent are too much burdened by the Parasites and start to resist the situation.
For smart young people the choice is:
If you go to university to get a good life, if you aim to benefit from the Indifferent you just want to be a member of the Parasitic-class (Hypocrelite);
Or you go to university to learn, because you are curious, you probably identify as a member of the Co-operates.
Histroy learns us that a trias-parasitico always grows to the level where society can no longer cary the burden its core value (money) starts to inflate.
What are you?
What class are you? An Indifferent, a Parasitic, or a Co-operate. Or a mix?
Natural attitudes towards human cooperation
Socialism (progressive) versus Free Market Liberal (conservative) is very old. It is in fact Plato versus Aristoteles. Marx was Platonist. Plato already advocated the abolition of private property. Aristotle however argued that the things belonging to everyone receive the least care. If we accept that humanity is parasitic by nature, Since we cannot harvest sunlight directly, we can see that people are always parasitic to other forms of life. Additionally, our biology needs minerals from the soil. On the other hand, we need our parents during our early years. In general, we can hardly survive without cooperating with others.
The issue of how to organize modern society is how to structure it so that we cooperate for the greater good in the future. All the "isms" have certainly failed. Modern education has also lost its sense of responsibility to the community. We need to reorganize public services and education in order to survive.